Number | 623
|
Notify-List |
|
Category | errata
|
Synopsis | 26.6.15 should not be modeled with multiple labels on one transition
|
State | ptfpassed
|
Class | errata-ptf
|
Arrival-Date | Sep 20 2004
|
Originator | Charles A. Dawson
|
Release |
|
Environment |
|
Description |
The transition from mod path to path term has three labels: vpiModPathIn vpiModPathOut vpiModDataPathIn This and 26.6.17 are the only places where this notation is used, and 26.6.17 is being rectified via PTF 530. This diagram should be changed as well. |
Fix |
Make three seperate one to many transitions from mod path to path term. Label each one seperately, using the labels vpiModPathIn vpiModPathOut vpiModDataPathIn Each should have a one to one transition back to mod path. One of the path term enclosures will need to be the definition, as is currently in the diagram. I'll send out a same diagram seperately. This has been resolved via: http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000310 |
Audit-Trail |
Fix replaced by chas@cadence.com on Mon Sep 20 11:18:29 2004 Make three seperate one to many transitions from mod path to path term. Label each one seperately, using the labels vpiModPathIn vpiModPathOut vpiModDataPathIn Each should have a one to one transition back to mod path. One of the path term enclosures will need to be the definition, as is currently in the diagram. I'll send out a same diagram seperately. Fix replaced by chas@cadence.com on Thu Mar 17 10:00:01 2005 Make three seperate one to many transitions from mod path to path term. Label each one seperately, using the labels vpiModPathIn vpiModPathOut vpiModDataPathIn Each should have a one to one transition back to mod path. One of the path term enclosures will need to be the definition, as is currently in the diagram. I'll send out a same diagram seperately. This has been resolved via: http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000310 |
Unformatted |
|
Hosted by Boyd Technology