Add Proposal | Add Analysis | Edit Class, Environment, or Release |
Number | 418
|
Category | errata
|
Synopsis | review 1364-2001 ballot comments and responses
|
State | open
|
Class | errata-discuss
|
Arrival-Date | Aug 18 2003
|
Originator | Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
|
Release | 2001b
|
Environment |
|
Description |
We should systematically review the ballot comments we received on Draft 5 of 1364-2001 and the responses we made. The reason is that there have already been several cases of ballot comments that seem to have been ignored, some of which pointed out real errors and were not corrected. There have also been cases of problems which were pointed out at the time, rejected at that time by the Working Group, and since have come up again independently after the release of the standard. Finally, there have also been cases of responses to the ballot comments, involving agreed-on changes to the draft of the document, which were not implemented correctly. -- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478 |
Fix |
|
Audit-Trail |
|
Unformatted |
|
Hosted by Boyd Technology