| Add Proposal | Add Analysis | Edit Class, Environment, or Release |
| Number | 374
|
| Category | errata
|
| Synopsis | 27.32 putting values with delay are they active or inactive?
|
| State | open
|
| Class | errata-ptf
|
| Arrival-Date | Jun 26 2003
|
| Originator | Charles Dawson
|
| Release | 2001b
|
| Environment |
|
| Description |
According to Chris Spear at Synopsys. Verilog-XL treats an acc_set_value() with accTransportDelay and a delay of zero as an inactive event. This is not specified in either the PLI 1.0 sections or VPI sections. How should these events be treated? |
| Fix |
|
| Audit-Trail |
From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com To: chas@cadence.com Cc: ptf-bugs@boyd.com Subject: Re: errata/374: 27.32 putting values with delay are they active or inactive? Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:24:12 +0300 (IDT) > According to Chris Spear at Synopsys. Verilog-XL treats > an acc_set_value() with accTransportDelay and a delay of > zero as an inactive event. This is not specified in either > the PLI 1.0 sections or VPI sections. How should these > events be treated? If it can be compared to a blocking assignment with delay #0, then Chris is apparently correct. 5.6.3 says that "If the delay is 0, the process is scheduled as an inactive event for the current time." |
| Unformatted |
|
Hosted by Boyd Technology