Re: Verilog-2001 language ready to roll ?

From: Paul Graham (pgraham@cadence.com)
Date: Tue Oct 23 2001 - 05:30:02 PDT

• Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Verilog-2001 language ready to roll ?"
• Previous message: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Verilog-2001 language ready to roll ?"
• In reply to: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Verilog-2001 language ready to roll ?"
• Next in thread: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Verilog-2001 language ready to roll ?"
• Reply: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Verilog-2001 language ready to roll ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Precedence: bulk

> There are other, less good ideas, to deal with the situation,
> but I don't want to give the IEEE ideas that there are other options.

What we really need is a golden simulator to settle these questions!

Paul

• Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Verilog-2001 language ready to roll ?"
• Previous message: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Verilog-2001 language ready to roll ?"
• In reply to: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Verilog-2001 language ready to roll ?"
• Next in thread: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Verilog-2001 language ready to roll ?"
• Reply: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Verilog-2001 language ready to roll ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 08 2002 - 12:54:47 PDT and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.